All posts by Garfieldlover2004
Who suggested it isn't important.
He says the admins are abusive, and with the way you're acting he's probably right. But even if he's bad in other ways, admin re-elections are a good idea.
How can you be sure Mickeyshabo has bad intentions? He seemed reasonable to me.
You said my poll was invalid and I was trying to start drama. That's not very nice.
You're wrong about the poll being invalid. I did nothing wrong, and if you want to cherry-pick voters you don't like that doesn't make the verdict of these polls any less relevant.
It's the only way to gauge community opinion.
They should all be treated equally. If they all are voted down by the community Fandom can take measures to keep things in order.
But Fandom Staff doesn't do that. The community has to police itself.
The admins being accountable to the community shouldn't be controversial. What's wrong with that?
That has nothing to do with the polls or the merits of the idea.
You're mistaken. This has nothing to do with TeeJay87's controversy, it was just a great idea suggested by Mickeyshabo for keeping the admins accountable.
I'm offering suggestions to help out. You can't just ignore someone because they're new. And if that's the way you want to run this wiki you need to put it in writing. The wiki has a rules page and none of this stuff is on there, so it's invalid.
Also, many of the people voting yes (your position) have never been active on the wiki either. What's up with that?
You're just making this stuff up as you're going along. There are no rules saying who can vote or not vote.
I don't see any such rule, and even so that's totally undemocratic.
Also, people should be allowed to join the wiki and chime in. Lurkers have rights.
Like I said, there are many dozens of votes. You can't invalidate all of them for three fake ones.
But there are many dozens of votes. One account doesn't prove anything.
There are no fake votes. You appear to be misinformed.
Please be respectful with each other. Thank you everyone!