And the Part 4:
They are below:
We did - although not all the questions were answered, those we got replies for explained pretty much.
Do we have substitute candidates for 9/19 and 12/19 in case the additional information isn't provided?
Sounds fine for me.
Good idea, we can always relocate the remaining candidates for later months.
Any candidates for the later months?
Somehow I doubt that Mrs. Campbell would trust you that much, Sonja.
How do I get the secret "escape" ending in the Garfield: Horror Reimagined on Gameboy?
According to this source https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fwR6mWJWuWQ&t=0s&list=PL3r1GUQio-5lKK5T8UYV7P-e-fXYYrWXi&index=2 , this game does not exist, the animation is just a concept.
Rules of logic state that you cannot get an ending in a non-existing video game unless you ask it's apparent creator https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCp2pLVMRCTCJh6WlQdFrH-A/about
You know Picholas, your idea does sound like quite a good question. I think we can add it to the list.
I don't have anything more to add, apart from the Q&A and we arranged so far.
Let's see what the remaining users of our Wiki have to say in this matter.
This shouldn't count as a rule violation - he simply expanded the discussion with a new topic.
Can't see the edit myself - it looks like he tried pushing his edit, it wasn't saved by the script, yet the system recognizes the edit being made.
Don't know how to treat this action. Perhaps we should blame the page script in this case?
Judging by the differences https://garfield.wikia.com/wiki/Board_Thread:Wiki_Discussion/@comment-27053744-20160809234514?diff=next&oldid=50446 , it'd indicate a part about "Garfield and Friends" was added, but I can't see it in the edited comment. The versions differ from each other only by the date of edit.
We can give Nicholas a 24 hour block for such minor manipulation.