Staff Vote on TeeJay87's Status on Promotion

This post is locked.

EllaStrudel·12/21/2023 in General

ATTENTION: THIS VOTE IS LIMITED TO WIKI STAFF. ANY NON-STAFF MESSAGES WILL BE BE IGNORED COMPLETELY. THANK YOU.

This thread is for conducting a staff vote to determine TeeJay87's future position on this wiki, and whether he will be considered for promotion past user status in the future; i.e. the ability to become an administrator or bureaucrat on the Garfield Wiki. Each of the four current administrators are eligible to vote: EllaStrudel, @Cooljoe01, @Low Spark of Lyman and @Flamey2007

A majority of votes cast must measure one way to reach an agreed-upon outcome. There will be a five day period for everyone to vote here, or if necessary, to change their votes. After five days, the thread will be locked and whatever decision is reached will be binding in any future promotion decisions on this wiki.

EllaStrudel·12/22/2023

I'd like to start this off by noting that TeeJay87 has been on the Garfield Wiki since 2011, and has been actively editing here since 2014. While he has made a large number of significant contributions to the wiki in that time, his combative and hostile nature when dealing with other users has been a serious problem for almost his entire tenure here. He has already been demoted from the position twice for these issues, most recently less than a month ago. The reasoning that myself and others provided at that time still applies, and over the years many others have also explained the problems with TeeJay87's behavior in detail and shown how harmful it is to the wiki. As a result, I do not believe further elaboration on that point is necessary.

On the issue of TeeJay87's most recent behavior, the clearest example can be seen in this thread. Here he responds to a simple editing dispute with vicious personal attacks, bizarrely accusing ZoKhMiKa of being a teenager and having a mental disorder, In addition, TeeJay87's private conduct on Discord in response to this incident (which the other three administrators are well aware of) was even worse, and in my view should be the last straw.

Therefore, I vote that TeeJay87 should not be eligible for consideration as an administrator or bureaucrat in the future.

TeeJay87·12/22/2023

Having seen this thread, it seems that evidence I gathered from another admin on Discord seems not falsified:

It should be obvious that the author of this post has been plotting against me out of malice since last month at least. The evidence is in conjunction.

Ella Strudel is also notorious of breaking her promises - please see the example below from today:

Is this how a Wiki admin is supposed to act? I believe no.

(Edited by TeeJay87)

TeeJay87·12/22/2023

II also have to add, that the same Ella Strudel did demand sample of my voice file for apologies. Other admins are aware of that.

I'm presenting evidence that this is not a libel:

When I gave Ella Strudel the voice file she did extort from me, I thought this would settle her hostilites against me.

Now I feel she will use my voice file for nefarious reasons, therefore if I am supposed to be marked as not be eligible for consideration as an administrator or bureaucrat in the future, so should be Ella Strudel for her abuses and nefarious approach to me.

TeeJay87·12/22/2023

Last but not least, the issue with ZoKhMiKa has been solved peacefully https://garfield.fandom.com/wiki/Message_Wall:Flamey2007?threadId=4400000000000035985#4400000000000092203

Flamey2007Garfield Wiki

And Ella Strudel deliberately silenced that fact. I believe this also proves that Ella Strudel has malicious intentions.

Flamey2007·12/22/2023

I won't make this too long, however as many users here have stated several reasons as to why TeeJay87 should not be re-promoted, however the most recent situation is the ZoKhMiKa one where he began accusing said user of being a teenager and having a disorder, aswell as aggressively replying to said user stating he was a vandal.

Therefore, my vote is to refrain TeeJay87 from promotion as a bureaucrat and believe he should not be eligible for consideration as an administrator in the future.