7 Votes in Poll
I don’t know what you mean, sorry!
The kid was talking about some sort of illusion Garfield and THE ILLUMINATI IDK ANYMORE 😢
Ok
We have a rule about the purpose of this Wiki - oner here https://garfield.fandom.com/wiki/Garfield_Wiki:Rules#1.01_-_General_Behavior section 1.01.08
"You are encouraged, but not required, to use the Garfield Wiki primarily for constructively editing its articles. However, if your primary purpose appears to be for fighting other users or creating drama, especially if it is focused on any particular users, you will be warned for such behavior before penalties shall be incurred. See 1.03.01.03 Spam for further information."
Your post seems like written to create drama instead of a productive activity. It is not your first transgression here as well.
@TeeJay87 This happened, This isn't for "Drama" I'm actually curious about if a so called Illusion Garfield exists. I'm sorry if this is harsh but why am I starting drama when you let a literal troll start actual drama. You need to get your motives straight if you hate drama why do you let the troll lie? He said that Garfield was ending and that zalgo is taking over Garfield. That is actual drama not me creating a poll, I don't think you're taking your rank seriously. And to be honest you have more drama than everyone else in the garfield wiki. Please do not let anyone else's behavior slide while pretending I'm the only one who has a slip up. Thank you for reading.
I see your comment requires division between sections. Here you go:
1) "@TeeJay87 This happened, This isn't for "Drama" I'm actually curious about if a so called Illusion Garfield exists." - Garfield is a fictional character, not a real-existing identity.
2) "I'm sorry if this is harsh but why am I starting drama when you let a literal troll start actual drama. You need to get your motives straight if you hate drama why do you let the troll lie?" - In other words, you are suggesting I should forcibly silence trolls by risking rage of FANDOM Staff, right? This is not the way to run a Wiki.
3) "He said that Garfield was ending and that zalgo is taking over Garfield. That is actual drama not me creating a poll, I don't think you're taking your rank seriously." - A lame excuse, clashing with your statement from point 2) above.
4) "And to be honest you have more drama than everyone else in the garfield wiki." - Can you prove that? I'd like to see the actual evidence for your claim.
5) "Please do not let anyone else's behavior slide while pretending I'm the only one who has a slip up. Thank you for reading." - Aye, nobody is perfect indeed. This doesn't mean you can last in flaws and use backpeddling. Conduct standards apply to anyone - admins like me and users like you. Thank you for reading.
@TeeJay87 I do not mean it in real life. I meant if the illusion Garfield character was cannon or made up by the child,
I don't want to fight,
What do you think?