Question:is this photo canon.
Question:is this photo canon.
It doesn't look like a photo to me. More like a fanart drawn in a style similar to Andy Hirsch, who drew a couple of KaBOOM! comic books.
Is it canon though
What are you trying to prove?
@Mickeyshabo Even if it's official (which i doubt), I don't think single art like that is usually canon. Where did you find it?
@EllaStrudel I think I found the source of this fan work - it's on Garfield's Facebook page, over here https://www.facebook.com/Garfield/posts/pfbid0KCcN637RcBxBNvhNuAbyRnZoMVPvE5vQjLKVsmfsU5NvCYifnZNa85THqzhLqHn3l
I assume Mickey intentionally posted it to start drama about clashing Garfield being a glutton himself (which is canon from what I recall) with non-canonical depiction of Garfield's gluttony through such a fan work.
Personally, I think this is what we call in my mother tonge "flapping for the sake of flapping".
I got i from garfields twitter page. I knew it was canon. I wanted to see if you knew.
Well if it's from an official page it might be canon, but even so it's just a single piece of (probably) fanart. Whether it's canon or not isn't a big deal. Also, given your previous behavior here, I don't think continuing to fool around like this will end well for you.
Even if it is official, that may not make it "canon". It could just be a dream, for example.
Totally
NO I CANNOT SPEAK THAT MUCH ABOUT THAT BUT IN AN GARFIELD AND FRIENDS AN EPISODE WAS SHOWING GARFIELD ATE SO MUCH FOOD THAT HE BECAME AS BIG AS A SOLAR SYSTEM BUT THAT ISN'T ACTUALLY INCLUDED IN THE GARFIELD CANNON AS IT WAS A EPISODE ABOUT AN SONG, AND PLUS I WON'T EVEN INCLUDE THE FACT THAT I WOULDN'T ACTUALLY HAPPEN EVEN IF GOING TO ACTUALLY BECOME BIGGER, I DON'T THINK IT'S ACTUALLY POSSIBLE FOR GARFIELD TO SHAPE SHIFT ANYMORE THAN JUST GROWING BIGGER
What do you think?